From Science to Pseudo-Science

In the short space of 50 years we have come from an era full of the excitement of scientific promise and advance to a time when prophets like Al Gore, robed in scientific costume, monopolise the public imagination.

We remember vividly watching sputnik – or what we thought was the satellite- cross the prairie sky. [sputnik speaks]

There are a number of tributes and remembrances on the anniversary of this momentous achievement. But we noticed particularly these laments.

The Space Age is dead, it died of starvation and neglect, somewhere around 1980. Yes, we fed it and gave it money while it was young, and exciting, and sexy, while our love for it was bright and new, but when it got older, and needed more expensive care and more of our time and understanding we guided it to a comfy chair over on the far side of the room, made it a cup of tea, handed it a magazine and left it to look after itself instead of giving it something useful and stimulating to do. Time passed, and we didn’t hear its calls for help because we were too busy wooing anew Age, the Computer Age, and then quickly and fickly moved on to The InternetAge. And so when the Space Age started to look sick, and tired, we hoisted it into a wheelchair, put it in a corner, and left it to die while we went out partying with Yahoo, and Google, and Windows and iPods and all their fancy friends. The Space Age effectively died of abuse. Now it’s time to lower its creaking coffin into the ground, toss a handful of soil onto it, and walk away into the rain under our umbrellas, mourning its passing, wondering, in vain, What Might Have Been if Things Had Been Different, simply denying our own role in its shameful death. [more ]

Who and what will inspire the next generation? David Suzuki?

“Sputnik showed that going into space was something that was viable,” said Ed Weiler, an astronomer who now directs NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.

“It inspired an entire generation of kids in this country to become scientists and engineers and it was that generation that gave us all the technology that we’re so happy to use today — communication satellites, Blackberries, computers, etc.,” Weiler said.

“The real fear is that our kids aren’t going into science and engineering like they used to — the rest of the world is, but we’re not,” he said. [more]

There is this heartfelt poem by Stuart Atkinson. We’ve copied only the last verse. Do read the rest at Cumbrian Sky.

Retreat …

I am ashamed of our Dunkirk retreat

from the solar system’s nearest beach;

afraid that in a thousand years

historians and scholars will sneer at us

and, hearing Armstrong speak

those famous New World words

will think our age absurd, and curse

our generation for its timid toe-dip

in the surf of the ocean of the night.

 

Science hasn’t stopped of course, although the space race has slowed to a crawl. Discoveries and advances are made every day. But people are fickle and the public has largely lost interest in real science. Perhaps they never understood it and so their passion can be easily captured by every charlatan that comes along.

 

 

Is there hope? Perhaps.

 

In an only slightly related vein, take a peek at this super pic of an Ecuadorean volcano backed by the seven sisters. h/t Universe today

 

14 Responses

  1. Why the derision of Al Gore? At least he has had the courage to stand up and champion science in an age when not many seem to care about science or the Earth.

  2. We believe, as do others ( see http://tinyurl.com/2j7el2 ) , that Al Gore’s pseudo-science distorts the truth. You perhaps do not. That may prove our point.

  3. The space age was more about engineering than science – in deed science generally took a back seat to political displays. “Man” in space has low scientific and big political payback. And some of the “science” resulting from the space program is particularly unsupportive of your views on the question of global warming. Pure science will always be done for the simple purpose of better understanding how our universe works. Applied science MAY help us solve some of the real problems confronting our planet.

  4. Our post was about what captures the public imagination. What has a place in the “culture” now seems to us (this is after all our blog and our opinions) to be pseudo science.

  5. Ah! Then Global Warming captures the imagination but it doesn’t meet your criteria for “science” so it’s not worth anything in a cultural sense? I would suggest that an attempt to address that issue, no matter how misguided, will do more to improve our planet than the space age ever did.

  6. Why so eager to change the subject? we wondered.

    But then on second thought – it is always very, very wise to think twice before posting a comment – you didn’t really change the subject since the issue of our original piece was the public’s present (increased we think) susceptability to charlatans and junk-science.

    And you have proved our point yet again. Thank you.

    PS you might like to use tinyurls otherwise long urls can get truncated in comment boxes.

  7. exactly – or conspiracy theories since you changed the subject

  8. whew! Thank goodness. We thought you believed in that stuff.

  9. as did we

  10. Today’s announcement must just rot your sox – those stupid Swedes, right?

  11. We expected it. If you have been reading here for any length of time – which you should be- you know that we have been saying that he hopes to run again. Hope you have also been reading the Of Note links in the sidebar.

  12. PS . The Nobel Peace Prize is given in Norway not Swedan.

Leave a Reply